Determining fair market value (FMV) can be a complex procedure, as it is on the specific realities and situations surrounding each appraisal project. Appraisers must exercise professional judgment, supported by trustworthy information and sound method, to figure out FMV. This typically needs mindful analysis of market patterns, the accessibility and reliability of comparable sales, and an understanding of how the residential or commercial property would carry out under typical market conditions including a prepared buyer and a prepared seller.

This short article will resolve identifying FMV for the meant usage of taking an income tax reduction for a non-cash charitable contribution in the United States. With that being said, this approach applies to other desired uses. While Canada's definition of FMV differs from that in the US, there are numerous similarities that enable this general methodology to be applied to Canadian functions. Part II in this blogpost series will address Canadian language particularly.

Fair market value is specified in 26 CFR § 1.170A-1( c)( 2) as "the cost at which residential or commercial property would alter hands in between a prepared buyer and a ready seller, neither being under any obsession to purchase or to sell and both having reasonable understanding of pertinent truths." 26 CFR § 20.2031-1( b) expands upon this meaning with "the reasonable market price of a particular item of residential or commercial property ... is not to be determined by a forced sale. Nor is the fair market price of an item to be identified by the sale price of the product in a market besides that in which such product is most frequently offered to the general public, taking into account the area of the item any place appropriate."
brave.app
The tax court in Anselmo v. Commission held that there need to be no difference between the meaning of fair market price for different tax usages and therefore the combined definition can be utilized in appraisals for non-cash charitable contributions.

IRS Publication 561, Determining the Value of Donated Residential Or Commercial Property, is the very best starting point for assistance on identifying reasonable market value. While federal regulations can seem complicated, the existing variation (Rev. December 2024) is just 16 pages and uses clear headings to assist you discover key info quickly. These principles are likewise covered in the 2021 Core Course Manual, starting at the bottom of page 12-2.

Table 1, discovered at the top of page 3 on IRS Publication 561, offers an important and succinct visual for determining reasonable market price. It notes the following considerations provided as a hierarchy, with the most trustworthy indications of identifying reasonable market price noted first. To put it simply, the table is presented in a hierarchical order of the strongest arguments.

1. Cost or selling cost

1. Sales of comparable residential or commercial properties
2. Replacement expense
3. Opinions of expert appraisers
   
   Let's explore each factor to consider separately:
   
   1. Cost or Selling Price: The taxpayer's cost or the real asking price received by a certified organization (an organization eligible to get tax-deductible charitable contributions under the Internal Revenue Code) may be the finest indicator of FMV, especially if the transaction occurred near to the appraisal date under common market conditions. This is most reliable when the sale was recent, at arm's length, both parties knew all pertinent facts, neither was under any compulsion, and market conditions remained steady. 26 CFR § 1.482-1(b)( 1) specifies "arm's length" as "a deal between one party and an independent and unassociated party that is conducted as if the two parties were strangers so that no conflict of interest exists."
   
   This lines up with USPAP Standards Rule 8-2(a)(x)( 3 ), which states the appraiser must offer enough info to suggest they adhered to the requirements of Standard 7 by "summarizing the outcomes of examining the subject residential or commercial property's sales and other transfers, agreements of sale, options, and listing when, in accordance with Standards Rule 7-5, it was required for reputable project outcomes and if such information was offered to the appraiser in the normal course of service." Below, a comment additional states: "If such info is unobtainable, a declaration on the efforts undertaken by the appraiser to obtain the info is required. If such info is unimportant, a statement acknowledging the existence of the details and mentioning its absence of relevance is required."
   
   The appraiser must ask for the purchase cost, source, and date of acquisition from the donor. While donors may hesitate to share this info, it is needed in Part I of Form 8283 and also appears in the IRS Preferred Appraisal Format for products valued over $50,000. Whether the donor decreases to offer these details, or the appraiser figures out the information is not relevant, this should be clearly documented in the appraisal report.
   
   2. Sales of Comparable Properties: Comparable sales are one of the most trusted and frequently used techniques for identifying FMV and are particularly persuasive to desired users. The strength of this approach depends upon numerous crucial elements:
   unspsc.org
   Similarity: The closer the equivalent is to the donated residential or commercial property, the more powerful the proof. Adjustments must be made for any distinctions in condition, quality, or other value relevant characteristic. Timing: Sales should be as close as possible to the appraisal date. If you utilize older sales information, first validate that market conditions have stayed stable and that no more recent similar sales are readily available. Older sales can still be utilized, however you need to change for any changes in market conditions to show the current worth of the subject residential or commercial property. Sale Circumstances: The sale must be at arm's length between notified, unpressured parties. Market Conditions: Sales need to happen under typical market conditions and not throughout abnormally inflated or depressed durations.
   
   To pick suitable comparables, it is essential to completely understand the meaning of reasonable market price (FMV). FMV is the price at which residential or commercial property would alter hands in between a ready purchaser and a willing seller, with neither celebration under pressure to act and both having reasonable knowledge of the facts. This definition refers specifically to real finished sales, not listings or estimates. Therefore, only sold results should be used when identifying FMV. Asking costs are simply aspirational and do not reflect a consummated deal.
   
   In order to choose the most common market, the appraiser needs to think about a wider overview where comparable pre-owned items (i.e., secondary market) are sold to the public. This normally narrows the focus to either auction sales or gallery sales-two distinct marketplaces with various dynamics. It's important not to integrate comparables from both, as doing so fails to clearly recognize the most common market for the subject residential or commercial property. Instead, you ought to think about both markets and after that pick the finest market and include comparables from that market.
   
   3. Replacement Cost: Replacement expense can be considered when figuring out FMV, but just if there's a reasonable connection between an item's replacement cost and its reasonable market worth. Replacement cost describes what it would cost to change the item on the appraisal date. Oftentimes, the replacement expense far surpasses FMV and is not a trusted indication of value. This technique is used rarely.
   
   4. Opinions of expert appraisers: The IRS permits expert opinions to be thought about when identifying FMV, however the weight offered depends on the professional's credentials and how well the opinion is supported by truths. For the opinion to bring weight, it must be backed by reputable proof (i.e., market information). This method is used infrequently. Determining reasonable market worth involves more than applying a definition-it requires thoughtful analysis, sound approach, and dependable market data. By following IRS guidance and thinking about the truths and scenarios linked to the subject residential or commercial property, appraisers can produce conclusions that are well-supported. Upcoming posts in this series will even more check out these concepts through real-world applications and case examples.