Available in the market of dietary supplements, a low level of certainty exists within the state of the science, coupled with not always understanding what's within the product. Together these points make weighing advantages/dangers difficult and hinder the flexibility to information evidence-based follow choices. The authors sought to identify priorities and develop potential solutions to deal with analysis gaps so that information disseminated, can ultimately, be relied upon, when trying to make applicable and secure selections. Using a modified-Delphi process, 8 panelists reviewed proof, offered from systematic review, on dietary complement ingredients for Alpha Brain Clarity Supplement health, and prioritized gaps recognized and offered potential solutions. Research gaps specific to dietary supplements analysis included the need for quality testing of products, the question of bioavailability and absorption of elements, and optimal composition and standardization of supplements underneath investigation. Other gaps related to populations studied