Doctors Say 'Brain Health' Supplements Are 'Pseudoscience'
Cierra Aronson upravil tuto stránku před 2 týdny


In an opinion piece in a recent edition of the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), three neurologists at the University of California San Francisco’s (UCSF) Memory and Mind Guard cognitive support Aging Center wrote that older Americans are being ripped off and served false hope by the multi-billion-dollar "best brain health supplement health" supplements trade. "This $3.2-billion trade … " the neurologists wrote. "No recognized dietary complement prevents cognitive decline or dementia, yet supplements marketed as such are broadly available and appear to achieve legitimacy when sold by main U.S. The neurologists also warned a few "similarly concerning category of pseudomedicine" involving interventions promoted by licensed medical professionals that are said to counteract unsubstantiated causes of dementia, akin to steel toxicity, mold publicity and infectious diseases. "Some of those practitioners might stand to achieve financially by selling interventions that are not covered by insurance coverage, similar to intravenous nutrition, personalised detoxification, chelation therapy, Mind Guard cognitive support antibiotics or stem cell therapy. These interventions lack a identified mechanism for treating dementia and are expensive, Mind Guard cognitive support unregulated and potentially harmful," the article states.


Earlier this month, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a press release saying it posted 17 warning and advisory letters to domestic and international corporations that illegally promote 58 products - a lot of them dietary supplements - that declare to prevent, deal with or cure Alzheimer’s illness and different critical health conditions. The FDA mentioned the merchandise are often bought on websites and social media and comprise unapproved new medicine and/or misbranded medicine. "These merchandise could also be ineffective, unsafe and will prevent a person from in search of an applicable diagnosis and remedy," the FDA stated. The current actions by the UCSF neurologists and the FDA would possibly lead many to marvel what to consider these supplements and methods to know whether any kind of complement is basically efficient and secure. Dr. Joanna Hellmuth, one of many authors of the JAMA article, just lately browsed the supplements aisle at a natural foods store in San Francisco, discovering a complete shelf filled with dietary products claiming to enhance cognitive well being and forestall dementia.


The dosage instructions on the bottles amounted to a price range of between $20 to $60 monthly, she says. She regarded up the lively ingredients on one of the bottles. "There was definitely data on its efficacy, but it surely was very poor-high quality knowledge in a very low-quality journal," Hellmuth says. All of the patients Hellmuth and her colleagues see at the UCSF Memory and Aging Center have cognitive points. The neurologists wrote the JAMA opinion piece, partially, as a result of their patients regularly ask about mind guard brain health supplement health supplements, Hellmuth says. They are trying to find solutions as they face the fact that today, there is no recognized drug or different intervention that really stops, slows or prevents Alzheimer’s and other dementias. In addition, older adults who don’t suffer from cognitive decline however worry about getting it sooner or later might be intrigued by merchandise that promise to stave off dementia. "If folks really reflect, quite a lot of that is motivated by fear, which is understandable because these diseases are horrible, they’re horrifying," Hellmuth says.


"They are diseases that alter your character, who you might be as an individual. That concern is what the Mind Guard cognitive support health supplements industry feeds on, she says. "It’s not that vitamins or supplements in themselves are dangerous